Skip to content
HR & Talent Management

Flexible Working in the Global Gambling Sector: Emerging Benchmarks and Strategic Implications

Snapshot Summary:
Flexible working models have evolved from temporary pandemic measures into long-term workforce strategies across the global gambling sector. With operations spanning retail, digital, and regulated jurisdictions, gambling companies are adopting hybrid, remote, and schedule-flexible models to improve staff retention, technology adoption, and cost management. While mature operators are embedding flexibility into workforce planning, benchmarks remain uneven due to regional regulation, licensing obligations, and role-specific constraints.

This insight presents verifiable, sector-relevant data on how flexible working is being implemented globally, what challenges persist, and the implications for leadership.


Key Findings:

1. Hybrid Working is Now the Norm for Corporate Functions
According to a 2024 Gitnux analysis of global operators, 68% of gambling companies now use hybrid work models for their corporate and digital teams. These models typically involve 2–3 days per week in-office, often aligned to compliance, IT security, or strategic collaboration rhythms.

2. Role-Based Flexibility Is Uneven Across Markets
Remote or hybrid options are predominantly available to tech, marketing, compliance, and finance roles. Customer service and trading functions offer limited flexibility due to shift coverage and regulatory obligations. For example, over 80% of sportsbook risk teams surveyed in Europe operate under fixed, office-based rosters due to latency and monitoring requirements.

3. Tech Investment Is a Prerequisite
Operators investing in remote infrastructure report measurable gains. A 2023 survey across Tier 1 European gambling firms found that 66% enhanced compliance monitoring through secure VPNs and digital logbooks, while 73% used remote audit tools for internal and external inspections.

4. Employee Retention and Satisfaction Are Impacted
A 2023 EY survey of gambling and fintech workers in EMEA found 41% would consider leaving their employer if flexible working was reduced. This aligns with broader findings from the CIPD, where 87% of UK employees preferred hybrid or remote models, and 45% would trade pay for flexibility.

5. Regulatory Constraints Shape the Limits of Flexibility
Markets such as Sweden and Spain require certain operational controls (e.g. real-time affordability checks, direct intervention protocols) to be managed on licensed premises. In contrast, Malta and Gibraltar frameworks enable greater remote management under strong supervision systems.


What This Means for Leadership:

Flexible working is no longer a discretionary benefit; it is a structural feature of workforce strategy. Leaders in the global gambling sector must treat it as a core pillar of talent management, risk alignment, and cost control.

For global operators, flexibility is also a tool for compliance scalability. Where local presence is not mandatory, remote-ready teams allow for faster market entry, consolidated risk functions, and more efficient license maintenance. However, leadership must calibrate flexibility by role and jurisdiction, ensuring that operational integrity and regulatory standards are not compromised.

Crucially, flexibility should not be equated with informality. Strong governance, across access controls, data policies, supervision mechanisms, and employee support, is essential. Companies that formalise and communicate their flexible working models are more likely to retain top talent and meet evolving compliance expectations.


Internal Questions to Ask:

  • Which roles in our organisation require fixed-location work, and are we clear about why?
  • Are we tracking whether flexible working correlates with higher retention, productivity, or engagement in our teams?
  • Do our supervisory and compliance systems allow for effective oversight of remote or hybrid roles across markets?
  • How do our flexible working policies compare to regulatory expectations in each of our licensed jurisdictions?
  • Are our flexible working policies inclusive of non-head office roles, such as customer support or retail operations?

Sources:

  • Gitnux, “Remote and Hybrid Work in the Gambling Industry Statistics” (2024)
  • EY, “Work Reimagined Survey – EMEA Gambling and Fintech Insights” (2023)
  • CIPD, “Flexible Working: Employee Preferences and Future Outlook” (2024)
  • Malta Gaming Authority and Swedish Gambling Authority operator guidance notes (2023–2024)
  • TGB Member Roundtable Notes, Q4 2024

Note: The figures reflect the latest available benchmarks as of Q1 2025. Regional variations exist based on licensing models and market maturity.