LETTER: Trump using emergency powers to override the Constitution
Summary
Richard L. Strickland of North Las Vegas writes in support of Rich Lowry’s column, arguing that former President Donald Trump and his allies are abusing the label “national emergency” to sidestep constitutional limits. Strickland praises Lowry for blaming Trump directly and insists this misuse of emergency powers effectively overrides the Constitution.
Key Points
- The letter credits Rich Lowry for calling out what the writer sees as a wrongful use of “national emergency” declarations.
- Richard L. Strickland places responsibility squarely on Donald Trump and his associates for misusing emergency powers.
- The writer argues that such actions amount to overriding constitutional checks and balances.
- The letter is a short, pointed opinion piece from a North Las Vegas resident published in the Review-Journal letters section.
Why should I read this?
Quick and straight to the point — if you want a no-frills take from a local reader on why Trump’s emergency-declaration tactics are dangerous, this saves you reading a longer analysis. It nails the blame and reminds you why the phrase “national emergency” matters.
Context and Relevance
This letter sits inside a broader, ongoing debate over executive power and the proper scope of “national emergency” declarations. In recent years there have been repeated legal and political fights over whether presidents can use emergency authorities to bypass Congress or normal processes. For readers following separation-of-powers issues, civil-liberties debates or US politics in 2025, the piece is a concise reflection of public concern and partisan argument about constitutional limits.
Author style
Punchy — the writer lays blame plainly and echoes a larger conservative columnist’s critique, giving the letter a clear, emphatic voice that underscores why the topic matters.